Why is US B2B PR so difficult?
Time to read: 2 minutes
Just so happy to be doing transatlantic PR again, here’s a post from our US PR partner on why it’s not easy securing the US column inches.
It doesn’t matter where in the world you want PR coverage, you will find the journalists you need are a busy lot. Their publications are under competitive attack, staff have been cut, acquisitions and closures are commonplace, everyone is doing more with less and covering more areas and, well, it all sounds rather familiar doesn’t it?
Journalists and their organizations face many of the same issues you do in your business. And just like any busy company expert, journalists want only the most insightful and relevant information and sources to ensure they do the best job possible. That makes getting their attention, building a relationship and winning their trust all the more challenging and important.
The U.S. journalistic landscape is similar to the UK although larger. According to Pew Research’s “State of the News Media 2014” report there are 38,000 full time journalists employed within the traditional U.S. newspaper industry alone (not to mention TV, magazines, etc.). Comparatively, the European Journalism Centre reports similar full time newspaper journalists in the UK. Digital native sites are growing on both sides of the pond, yet still employ only a small numbers with about 5,000 full-time U.S.-based editorial jobs at nearly 500 digital news outlets.
Whether traditional or digital, one big difference is ownership. Certainly there are U.S. conglomerate owners, however the UK newspaper market is generally far more nationalistic with fewer owners.
What does all this mean to you? Obviously you aren’t after every US journalist. You want only a logical niche of decision makers to notice your new product/service or entry into the market. As you should. But that doesn’t necessarily make it easier.
Here’s why. Think about your competition. How many companies will you compete with in the U.S.? 10? 20? 50? More? How many of your European competitors are also entering or active in the U.S.? How many non-industry companies are nipping at your heels trying to steal the same potential customers?
Each of those and all the ones not yet identified are engaging PR to contact the same journalist you want. Whilst there are about 50,000 PR professionals in the UK, there are nearly 230,000 PR professionals in the U.S. Talk about competition!
Now think back to that busy journalist looking for someone to validate or negate the premise of an article (yes that has a lot to do with it). The journalist must be accurate. And the editor and the publisher need them to have a differentiated story than the other media outlets in their niche. After all, eyes on their story and their publication translate into revenue for survival.
So, who does the journo turn to? Someone they know will deliver. And yes, despite journalistic outcry, the line is blurring between editorial coverage and those who do or could buy advertising or sponsorships. Remember how different the ownership of US media outlets is compared to the UK? That can increase in importance when those paid and earned media lines blur.
So the number 1 reason it is trickier to get your story told by a U.S. journalist is pure and simple -competition.
And #2? Your story absolutely must be relevant to the U.S. reader/viewer. It is not enough to believe your product/service is right for them. It means understanding U.S. centric issues and trends – not just of your potential customers, but of the journalist as well.
Your chances will significantly improve if you can produce a U.S. customer. Some journos won’t talk to “vendors” without one. If you don’t have a U.S.-specific example, the challenge for coverage is even greater. Not impossible, but challenging. It is very likely you will share the story with one of those U.S. competitors you identified.
But it’s not all doom and gloom. Truly, it’s not. You just need the experienced insight of localized PR. That’s the same in any country. A world view is quite important strategically but localized insight is invaluable.
As for the U.S., remember those growing digital outlets? Turns out, whilst mainstream U.S. media are sharply decreasing their global coverage, digital is on a quest to include more global coverage. And that spells opportunity! Plan your strategy wisely. This is the perfect time to think global and act local.
Ensuring AR programmes deliver to the bottom line: Part 3
Time to read: 3 minutes
The third post on ensuring AR programmes deliver is courtesy of Eria Odhuba, a founder member of the team and our resident analyst relations guru:
Part one of this series examined why AR programs fail and what you need to do before speaking to analysts. In part two, we provided metrics to consider measuring and questions to consider to maximise AR’s impact. In this final part, we look at integrating your good work with analysts and broader marketing activities. This will ensure everything feeds into your overall business objectives…
Do people REALLY know what they’ll get from the description of your products or services?
Your problem: If you only offer services, this can be one of the hardest things to do correctly. How do you convince prospects to buy from you if it takes time to realise significant benefits? Are you confident that how you have named or packaged what you sell articulates the benefits clients would get if they bought from you? If prospects don’t know what benefits they get from what is on offer, then price is all they’ll use to make purchase decisions. The impact on your bottom line is huge if your competitors package themselves much better than you do. Poor product packaging often happens when marketing and sales teams don’t interact effectively.
How analysts can help: Analysts provide guidance regarding product or service packaging as part of wider marketing efforts. Their unique insight into the various strategies competitors use means they can help build services around your unique perceived benefits (UPBs). They can also show you how to break services down into logical processes that are easy to follow and which, more importantly, clearly show what prospects will get.
Do you know your customers’ lifecycles, and have you changed the way you provide value to them over time?
Your problem: A customer lifecycle is the journey someone makes from initially discovering your products/services to being a client. It is essential to understand lifecycles to manage client relationships effectively and tailor your messages or services accordingly. Marketers must answer the following questions to add value to each stage of a customer lifecycle:
What factors influence initial purchase decisions within specific niches? How does this compare with what competitors offer? Do you know what end results your clients actually desire? What are the market/technology changes impact the continued use or upgrade of specific technologies or services?
Without this information, marketers will struggle to manage each step of a typical customer lifecycle effectively. For example, consider companies that have tried to renew contracts or upsell additional services without appropriately tracking client needs. Tales of woe after deals have been signed are familiar. A lot of this is due to the inability to effectively manage the various stages of customer or partner lifecycles.
How analysts can help: When you’re fighting day-to-day battles and trying to get quick wins to justify marketing budgets, it can be hard to step back. Hard to have a big-picture view of whole lifecycles and the different engagement methods necessary to nurture early prospects or long-term clients.
Getting independent feedback on how best to do so might not be something you have considered. Analysts, especially those with a good knowledge of licensing and contracts, can provide independent advice to companies to help them better manage customer lifecycles. Of course, the products and/or services you provide have to be spot on in the first place. However, given that there is almost always a choice that could be made, marketers should use industry analysts to stop customers from getting fed up and looking elsewhere because their continually changing needs are not being met.
Are you using the right traditional and social media channels to communicate?
Your Problem: Every marketer knows they must communicate through the media channels their prospects and clients use. Whatever media channels you use to generate leads, solidify thought leadership, or remain at the top of clients’ minds, you need to know which ones the analysts use to share information.
For example, you need to see if you potentially lost a deal because of comments made by an analyst via a blog or online forum. The problem here for marketers is the perceived loss of control and the lack of resources to do this effectively. Given the tight budgets many marketing departments have, it can be tough to justify the time and effort. It all comes back to the feedback you collected from clients and prospects
How analysts can help: If prospects/clients are influenced by specific channels that analysts also use, then you need to make sure you engage with the analysts via the same channels (on top of regular briefings) so that you can positively influence their output. Commenting on their blogs and participating in discussions helps you understand analysts’ frustrations with technology vendors. It also means you engage with them more effectively and, hopefully, can convert them into advocates.
AR is often seen as an add-on to marketing and PR activities that is hard to measure and whose budget is hard to defend. Sticking your neck out and planning long-term engagements can be challenging when we are all judged on quick wins.
But trust is hard to come by now, and we are pretty cynical about most of the content and claims from many technology companies. Engaging with analysts, earning their respect and winning their support can deliver the essential credibility factor into the marketing mix.
***
How to ensure AR programmes deliver to the bottom line: Part 2
Time to read: 3 minutes
In the second post, courtesy of Eria Odhuba, a team founder and our resident analyst relations guru, we look at how best to measure the impact of AR programmes.

those are big ears, is that relavant?
In part one, I discussed the reasons AR programmes fail and what you should do before speaking to analysts. In this post, we examine some metrics you should consider measuring. We also look at a few questions you should ask yourself to maximise AR’s impact on your marketing. This should help create the right foundation for effective AR programmes.
AR programmes: Metrics to measure
If you don’t know your key marketing and sales metrics, how do you know what needs to improve? And if you don’t know what needs improving, then what is the point of doing AR?
Typical metrics you need to know include:
1. Number of enquiries for a product or service
2. Number of referrals made by existing customers or partners
3. Percentage of enquiries and referrals converted into RFPs
4. Typical lead response times
5. Number of RFPs that convert into actual sales
6. Number of active customers
7. Total spend per active customer
8. Customer churn rates
9. Gross revenue
10. Gross profit
11. Marketing costs
12. Marketing costs per enquiry
13. Marketing costs as a % of gross profit
14. Cost of sales (i.e. cost of converting RFPs into actual clients)
Once you pass this information to your analysts, they will be able to compare you with your competitors and identify specific activities or messages that need improvement.
Tap into their knowledge of industry go-to-market, partnership, and channel strategies.
Use their unique insight into competitor or industry-wide metrics to test how well you are doing.
You must position your company more clearly in your target markets most of the time. If the analysts don’t believe your messages resonate with your prospects’ needs, you will need to keep tweaking.
The key marketing metric takeaway is that analysts can only help you improve your marketing and sales metrics if you measure them properly in the first place.
Is what you say you do what people think you do?
To develop an accurate representation of your company’s technology or services, you must first get the correct feedback from customers, independent influencers, and your employees.
You need a well-defined process for asking the right people the right questions, storing the answers, and providing easy access to anyone developing marketing strategies.
When approaching customers for feedback, you need to get them to do so based on a full understanding of the key competitive options available. You need to understand why they bought from you but might not do so again, or what their biggest frustrations are with vendors in your sector(s). Finally, you must understand where they look for information and how they make purchase decisions. This can help you direct resources to the most appropriate channels.
Your employees’ feedback should be consistent across the various teams. There is little worse than having the sales and marketing teams disagree on the best action to take to generate leads, or because of internal feuds.
All this feedback needs to be independently analysed or verified. This is where analysts are essential. They should be used to sanity check feedback and company-led competitor research. They will compare it with opinions they get from end-users or your competitors. Based on this, they can advise you on using the feedback to change your product or service strategies.
Are you talking to the right people?
This is all about marketing to specific niches/target markets so that you maximise your marketing resources.
The people you target should want what you offer and be actively looking for a solution to specific problems that you can provide. More importantly, they should have the money to buy from you and be easily reached by your marketing efforts.
Analysts have a good knowledge of potential target markets and will advise you on how best to reach out to them. They know the drivers and trends that impact purchase decisions. Though bound by client confidentiality, their inside knowledge should be tapped to re-focus your marketing messages and tactics. Analysts also monitor regulatory and industry trends and will suggest markets to consider that you might have ignored.
Part three, we’ll look at some thorny marketing problems AR can help solve.
Postscript: These three AR posts have proved pretty popular. So we’ve put them together, ripped out the fluff, given it a bit of structure and turned them into a whitepaper, which you are welcome to download here:
Award-winning clients – I’m basking in their reflective glory
Time to read: 1 minute
Tips for entering Tech Awards
Last week, BJSS, a Comms Crowd client, won the TechWorld Award for Best Public Sector project. It’s a genuinely cool project, re-engineering a very big data warehouse, bringing it in-house, fully automating it and helping the NHS to save on human resources and money – both scarce commodities in the public sector these days.
![]() |
if you had to guess which one of us was not an award-winning software engineer, who would you pick? |
The awards themselves were also impressive, in a transparently objective kind of way. Projects were free to enter, the award ceremony free to attend, and they even gave an award to a company that couldn’t make it. In all my days, I’ve never seen that before. Fair play.
So I am very pleased for my client. It’s a huge validation of their great work, and I’m pretty pleased for us too. I didn’t write the award-winning software, but I did have a hand in writing the award-winning entry.
Here are some tips for drafting those perfect 1,000 words:
- Get buy in – you can’t do these on your own, work as close as you can with the client ping pong the entry back and forth until it’s perfect.
- Allow enough time – we think it takes about a day and a half on average to draft and edit a standard 1,000-word award entry, assuming you already know the story.
- Start early – at least three weeks before – get information from a source, i.e. the people who worked on the project.
- Answer the question – every award has a bias, so be sure to answer the questions exactly as they are asked.
- Word count – keep it tight, and don’t waffle.
- Before and after stats demonstrate ROI, without these, don’t bother to enter.
- Have a heart – think of the poor judges and how many submission they have to read, do make an effort to tell a darn good yarn, keep the narrative sparkly and fluid.
Post Script: other award-winning entries include:
- 15/04/2013 Caplin wins Best Web Implementation at the Sell Side Technology Awards
- 02/12/2013 BJSS wins Best Big Data Project at the Tech Success Awards.
- 15/04/2014 Caplin wins Best Web Development Platform at the Sell Side Technology Awards.
- 14/06/2014 BJSS wins Best Information Technology at the Best Business Awards
- 14/07/2014 BJSS ranked fourth for International Growth in Sunday Times Tech Track 200
- 15/07/2014 Caplin wins Best Trading Technology Vendor at the FX Week Awards
![]() |
Gonna need a bigger banner |
How to ensure AR programmes deliver to the bottom line – part one
Time to read: 2 minutes
The first post courtesy of Eria Odhuba, a founder member of the collective and our resident AR programmes guru:
There are many reports about how to conduct an analyst relations (AR) programme. Tou can also follow discussions on various LinkedIn groups.
Many of these cover some common areas, such as how to provide a good briefing or how to track and tier analysts. Yet some people find measuring AR programmes’ impact on the bottom line challenging. As a result, the board can see AR simply as a cost centre, with marketing teams struggling to extract and prove its value.
In this three-part series, we look at how to integrate your analyst work with wider marketing activities, ensuring everything feeds into your overall objectives.
What defines successful AR programmes?
Successful AR programs use analysts to improve lead generation, shorten sales cycles and retain customers. That’s basically it!
When managing AR, companies should avoid briefing analysts simply with the short term aim of receiving positive feedback or a quote for a press release. Success has to have a positive effect on a company’s bottom line.
Look at the bigger picture. Analysts influence purchase decisions through their reports and recommendations, or as a result of help given by analysts to position a company more effectively within its target market.
In successful AR programmes, marketing and sales teams work closely together. They involve analysts and ensure analyst feedback is shared internally with specific action resulting in more competitive positioning, compelling messaging, and customer-focused products and services.
Give your AR programme a health check
- Are you only looking for the endorsement or quote?
- Are you focused on one-off engagements rather than building a relationship?
- Are you deprived of the time, expertise or resources required to run a measurable programme?
- Are the briefings timed around your news, the analyst research, or events?
- Are you lumping analysts in with the press, assuming one approach fits all?
- Are you taking the time to fully prep for a briefing?
- Are you sharing the analyst feedback internally?
- Is your AR programme synced up with lead gen and sales activities?
Symptoms of an ailing AR programme
- Difficulty forming an approach for new target markets due to a lack of independent insight.
- Outdated knowledge of key business or legislative drivers.
- Assuming what drives competitive success without independent testing.
- Limited ideas for possible partnership strategies.
- Limited channel knowledge and insights into where prospects look for information, resulting in no new routes to market.
- Poor understanding of whether company messaging is resonating due to an absence of message testing strategies.
Checklist to get your AR programme back in shape
- Be clear about what you want to get out of an AR programme. Raising awareness is all well and good, but if it does not result in more leads or better client retention, then you need to change it.
- Get stakeholder buy-in. Train spokespeople and teams about the value analysts provide.
- Develop proper metrics. Measuring briefing numbers and report mentions, running perception audits, or getting placed on various analyst rating scales are all good. However, if these metrics do not positively impact the bottom line, you need to rethink them.
- Define and target the right experts. Think about individual analysts and not just the firms they work for. Find out how they get information and influence decision-making processes. Don’t forget analysts from small or niche firms, as they may have a unique market impact that you could leverage.
- Plan regular engagements, such as at events, to gain trust instead of one-off jobs every year. Be prepared to follow up with information that helps an analyst with their research.
In the next post, we will start looking at the impact AR can have on various marketing tactics. and in part three, we’ll look at some thorny marketing problems AR can help solve.
Post script: These three AR posts have proved pretty popular. So we’ve put them together, ripped out the fluff, given it a bit of structure and turned them into a whitepaper, which you are welcome to download here:
Top ten tips for writing snappy copy
Time to read: 2 minutes
Because B2B commercial copy is for intelligent business consumption, making it sound grand is tempting, but this inevitably makes consumption so much more painful. It’s writing snappy copy you need to master.
Here are my top tips for writing edible copy:
Who are you writing for?
Write for one person. Assess their motivation for reading your copy. Will it enlighten, inform, entertain, motivate them to act? Think what’s in it for them. Assess the time they have to read it, their knowledge level.
Get the knowledge
It sounds obvious, but you need to know/understand at least as much as your reader. If you don’t have the knowledge, go and get it. Research it, ask questions, find an expert, and get them to draft it if necessary.
Get it all out
If you find yourself staring at a blank screen, just write down anything and everything related to what you are trying to say. From this, you can create structure and extract key facts.
Ask questions that can provide the structure
Ask yourself basic questions like Who, Why, When, Where, and What and answer them in bullet format. Leave the questions as subheads for now. Arrange the questions into a structure that will form the basis of your logical/persuasive argument.
Does it serve your purpose as well as theirs?
Your copy must add value to the reader, but does it also support your company messages? Make sure your copy always underlines a key value proposition. If it doesn’t, why are you writing it?
So what?
Then, read it through. Anything missing? Ask yourself, ‘Why do I care?’ ‘So what?’ and, ‘What’s so exciting about that?’ Imagine how everyone else feels if you’re bored by your own copy. (At this stage, this might be the longest your copy gets, from here on in, we are cutting it back).
Show not tell: De fluff
Use objective observation and facts to show. Not subjective adjectives and opinion to tell. You are not penning a love letter but compellingly presenting the facts. Imagine the building is on fire and you cannot leave the office until you have shouted the story from the window. This exercise will ensure you only use the words you need to say what has to be said and no more. Regarding snappy copy, a couple of carefully crafted sentences are more effective than a whole paragraph of jumbled thoughts.
Every time you review it, cut it
Aim to reduce word count every time you review the copy (3-5 times), with decent breaks in between sessions, to allow the creative brain to mull over the project and find the right phrase, the perfect word.
Don’t force it
Could you sneak your copy into the conversation? Would it sound natural, or would people think you had gone crazy, swallowed a dictionary, or been indoctrinated by brand Y. Be kind to your reader, and make your copy easy to read!
Read final draft out loud
Now, print off the copy and read it out loud. This helps spot the ‘silly’ mistakes your eyes haven’t seen, but your tongue will trip over. It will also help you with punctuation.
If you like, you can download these tips in a handy PDF to keep on your desk and front of mind.
Made by clever people for clever people
Time to read: 1 minute
In fintech, Sam Howard asks: Can clever comms people add value, or are they the weakest link?
I’m a comms person in b2b tech, primarily fintech. Fintech – that’s software geeks creating awesome stuff for banking geeks. All fintech comms people have to do is wrap their pretty little heads around how the global markets work. How a financial institution works and how it makes its money.
Then, evaluate the opportunities and obstacles created by the latest market conditions and regulations. Opportunities and obstacles might help or hinder it from making that money. And then piece together how their client’s technology taps into those opportunities and obstacles, so a bank might want to buy it.
Anyone got a PHD in anything at all they are not using right now?
Dear software geeks, we understand your fear of getting us comms people involved. We share your fear. We have reoccurring nightmares where our efforts sufficiently underwhelm Anne Robinson.
But Einstein once said that if you can’t explain it to a six-year-old, you can’t explain it. Let’s assume everyone in the room is clever; it is the common denominator, so there is no need to posture on that. Don’t be tempted to use content to show off how much you know – they know you know. The key is to add some value to the debate, explain the complex lucidly, ensure that overarching points are not lost in the minutiae of the detail and that those points stack up to a logical argument leading to an insightful conclusion.
It’s not as ‘easy’ as it looks, I can tell ya, getting the people with the PHDs to look up not down, out not in. And if, in so doing, we tend to simplify things rather than wonder if we haven’t dumbed down your whole reason d’etre, just trust you know how to build software, and we know how to build reputations.
In the kingdom of the big and the clever, it’s the six-year-old kid you need to impress.
Ten tips for better media interviews
Time to read: 2 minutes
Sam Howard advises on how tech companies can give better media interviews.
Media training – that’s a terrible phrase, isn’t it? Makes you think of all those awful politicians that enunciate every syllable emphatically and use all their fingers to underline each phrase, talking at you as if you were Jeremy Paxman. So let’s not go there. But there is still much you can do to make sure your conversations with journalists go well. The key is to remember the journalist has very little time to create a very good story, and it’s your job to help them with that.
Some sensible tips for sensible media interviews:

so it’s adaptable scalable innovate and flexible is it? Yeah you lost me at ‘it’s’
1) The Press are more concerned with business arguments than technology methodologies. So, the WHY needs to be answered way before the HOW. This is where many tech companies need to lift their heads. The WHO is pretty interesting, too. Whatever you do, don’t tone down your colourful characters.
2) The old truism,’ no one is that interested in you,’ is – erm – true. They are interested in issues, though. If you can help solve them, then that’s the angle to go in on.
3) Journalists are busy, so PLEASE get to the point. Work out how your issue-based messages can be delivered top-down. If you’ve struck a chord, you can drill down with more insight or leave it as a one-liner if it gets no traction.
4) It sounds obvious, but actively listen to and genuinely try to answer the question. You need to answer questions as best you can, weave in your messaging where appropriate, and leave it out where it isn’t.
It’s critical to be seen as someone who understands the market and how it ticks
This is more important than getting all your messages across in every interview, euch! You may manage it the first time, but I doubt if anyone will want to talk to you a second time. However, if you can establish yourself as a credible and trusted source, then the journalist is more likely to talk to you when you have relevant news.
5) The journalist is looking to create a compelling story from a mixture of background information, intelligent argument and quotes. If you want to be quoted, you need to have a view and be incisive. Otherwise, you find most of your effort gets swallowed up in unattributed body copy or as background information. Answers can be your own thoughts based on experience or theory, statistically or anecdotally based or ideally a mixture of the lot.
6) Spokespeople should be reading a weekly digest of relevant hot stories, remember head up!
7) It should go without saying, but follow the publication and the journalists you hope to meet so you can assess what messaging will resonate best for that particular journalist.
8) Be courteous, Allow time for the journalist to finish their note taking and prepare their next question, do not dictate or just talk into the silence. Offer sustenance, and DO NOT look at your phones.
9) Remember this is a two way conversation, ask what the journalist is seeing and hearing in the market and future story ideas he is working on.
10) Every interview is different, but you should be able to answer the following fundamental questions:
Where are your customers spending their IT budget in your sector in these cash-strapped times?
What are the drivers behind this (i.e. sticks and carrots)?
So, where do you fit in?
Other companies do what you do, so why are you better?
What tech Holy Grail are your customers chasing right now?
What’s preventing organisations from achieving it?
What are the key trends in your technology sector right now?
What’s your sector going to look like in five years?
PR Agency or PR freelancer? Who’s best to tell your company story?
Time to read: 2 minutes
Sam Howard’s top tips for whether to go with a freelancer or an agency.
Recently, I turned down a brief. Even my 11-year-old questioned the sanity of that one, “Have you seen my Christmas list?” he queried.
Although the brief specified a freelancer, it was for one with specialist knowledge of everything, from travel and technology to business, design, and gaming. And a fair few other categories for good measure.
I’m not exactly a one-trick pony, but this had AGENCY stamped all over it. I recommended a favourite and waved bye-bye to it. I’m as good as my last job, and I didn’t see how I could shine in that one. Besides, what’s the point of spending 100 hours bringing in results I quoted I could do in ten?
Deciding if a freelancer or an agency best: Five things to consider
1) Budget
The first factor most people consider. Freelancers should be charging about half their agency rate. “Bargain!” I hear you cry. But it’s not that simple. Say you hire a senior freelancer at account director level or above. Bear in mind that the day rate is fixed, no matter the task. So yes, fantastic value for money regarding strategy and guidance and good value for media outreach and creating content.
However, there is not so much when it comes to sourcing coverage, building media lists, feature research, reporting tools, etc. In an agency, a junior or intern would be tasked with mundane and time-consuming activities and could charge accordingly. You might be better with an agency if you have an admin-heavy/consultancy-light brief. News-heavy accounts (e.g. a release a week) also qualify for this model as they fit better into an agency ‘machine’.
2) Expertise
So if you need lots of different sectors covered off as described above, 100s of media outlets, it’s agency all the way, if you need integrated services, again an agency is often a smart choice although most freelancers have a trusted network they partner up with. But if you want access to senior level support or a fair amount of hand holding again a freelancer might be a better fit as account directors can be pretty thinly spread in a busy agency across six accounts or more. So your monthly retainer may only allows for a day – to half a day of precious ‘AD’ time.
3) Capacity
Everyone knows it’s a feast or famine for freelancers, but a feast for a freelancer might not be a banquet for you, the client. Be sure to understand your chosen freelancer’s workload and exactly how many concurrent clients they have. It may be their eyes are bigger than their hands-on abilities. This is less of a problem for agencies who have a bigger pool of staff and, of course, can hire should work levels remain consistently high.
4) Best practice
A good agency continues to hone and develop best practices. The opportunity to learn in an agency is one of the most compelling reasons to work there. A freelancer from ‘birth’ will not have had the same exposure and will have had a different learning experience. They may have developed some shabby habits, and I’m not just talking about dress code. If you are going to work with a freelancer, check their pedigree and make sure they have a good few years of agency or established in-house experience that they can bring to the table with them. Ask some journalists what they think.
5) Payment terms
And finally, if you know your company is somewhat backward at coming forward when settling its bills, again, go to an agency where the two account departments can fight it out between themselves, leaving your client relationship cosy. Working directly with a near-hysterical, half-starved freelancer who hasn’t been paid for 100 days will not necessarily get you the kind of exposure you had in mind. Think Sideshow Bob on Twitter.
Whoever you choose to partner with for your comms, go in with a glad heart and some real commitment so that 2012 is a great year for you both.
Imagine a world without Tech PRs

Is anyone interested in my very clever idea that you wouldn’t understand and I don’t know why anyone would buy it?
Time to read: 2 minutes
Sam Howard wonders do we really need tech PRs?
A recent survey by Careers Cast suggested that the life of a PR was second only to being a pilot in terms of stress.
“It’s not rocket science!” blasted journos all over Twitter
That’s very true, but PR can be a trite fraught. To illustrate my point, let’s imagine a world without PRs because everyone in The World of Tech was so good at connecting and communicating…
Once upon a time…
…there was an incredibly enthusiastic and irrepressible young journalist. To him, the glass was always half full, not that he was much of a drinker! One day, he had to catch a bus into the village to buy more typewriter ribbon. He planned to use this time to fact-check and spell-check his work before submitting it to his editor. “You are such a perfectionist!” The wise, old gentleman would kindly chide him whenever he handed in his copy a little late.
In the next village, there lived the most charming and charismatic inventor you could ever hope to meet. She also had to catch the bus to visit the local ironmonger, who she had commissioned to make more phalanges. Phalanges were a critical component in her latest invention.
Well, it must have been fate…
…for on that day, these two jovial people just happened to sit next to each other. Both were outgoing, possessing exceptional social skills and soon fell into a happy rapport. In no time, the earnest inventor told the curious journalist about phalanges and their properties in extraordinary detail. The journalist had all the time in the world to listen to the long list of features each permutation of phalanges delivered. Indeed, he was gripped. Having missed their stops, they were now walking companionably back into the village together. The journalist used his psychic skills to ascertain the unique business benefits that phalanges-based engineering could deliver to his readers.
And so, with great excitement, the journalist stopped in the lane and cried, “I believe this to be the singularly most important technological discovery of our time! Even though my beat is musical theatre, I’m sure my editor will give me the cover story to tell the world all about it.”
The inventor was somewhat overcome and demurred, “Golly, that’s terribly decent of you. But do you think you might wait a while before you write anything, as I now realise I’m not quite geared up for discovery?”
The journalist nodded solemnly…
…and true to his word, the story was published sometime later. Once the inventor had taken her suit to the cleaners, she decided on her company logo and got the phalanges-based product range to stop blowing up.
Within hours of that one story breaking, everybody was talking about it. And Ashton Kutcher, Lady Gaga, and Stephen Fry were all begging to be among the first to beta-test it. The company’s share price shot up, and the inventor became a multi-millionaire overnight.
As for the journalist, he was regarded as a technology guru whose wise words would forever be commissioned throughout the land. And they all lived largely ever after…
Yeah, like that happens all the time!
If it did, there might be no need for PRs to help companies articulate their offering and deliver compelling copy to the media. But it very rarely does, and making it so is sometimes a thankless task. But the second most stressful career?
OK, if it wasn’t for us PRs, the wheels of commerce might have to travel a more pot-holed road. But it’s not rocket science. It’s not like flying a plane or being a nurse, a firefighter, a prison warden, a teacher, a carer, or even a journalist. All jobs have a level of stress associated with them and in PR I think we might secretly like it, it’s nice to be needed.